>> Was this necessary, Jan? I assume that they are your words
>No, they are not my words!
>, as there >> was no indication that you were quoting anyone.
>Reading problems, Peter?
>Of course there was!
Umm, Jan, there was no ">" at the start of the lines in your post where those lines appeared. Therefore there was no indication that you were quoting anyone. Ipso facto (*) they appeared to be your words. I was shocked! Two exclamation marks shocked!!
(*) I apologise if using Popish Latin upsets your sensibilities, but I am old fashioned like that. Also, when I was studying law ...
>>> Was this necessary, Jan? I assume that they are your words
>> No, they are not my words!
>> , as there >>> was no indication that you were quoting anyone.
>> Reading problems, Peter?
>> Of course there was! >>> -- >>> Peter Bowditch
>Ready to apologize???
What for? I'm not the person who used vile language and then denied using it. -- Peter Bowditch aa #2243 The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles Australian Council Against Health Fraud http://www.acahf.org.au Australian Skeptics http://www.skeptics.com.au To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com
>"Sdores" <sdo...@bellsouth.net> wrote in message >news:ylL0h.18458$kI6.12507@bignews4.bellsouth.net... >> Good post, I would like to see more positive things posted about different >> things too. But shouldn't the title be different then having a name of a >> person in it? I took the name out. UM MOM Susan
>lol. Proving you are once again a proven*gang* member. Leaving my name >in........................
Maybe I'm a bit slow today, but could you explain how removing my name became "Leaving [your] name in"? -- Peter Bowditch aa #2243 The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles Australian Council Against Health Fraud http://www.acahf.org.au Australian Skeptics http://www.skeptics.com.au To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com
>>"Sdores" <sdo...@bellsouth.net> wrote in message >>news:ylL0h.18458$kI6.12507@bignews4.bellsouth.net... >>> Good post, I would like to see more positive things posted about >>> different >>> things too. But shouldn't the title be different then having a name of >>> a >>> person in it? I took the name out. UM MOM Susan
>>lol. Proving you are once again a proven*gang* member. Leaving my name >>in........................
> Maybe I'm a bit slow today, but could you explain how removing my name > became "Leaving [your] name in"? > Peter Bowditch aa #2243
I can't believe Jan Drewski has plopped 'peacemaker' UM MOM Susan into her category of *gang* members !! Jan's list of *gang* members grows faster than the numbers of parasites Jan claimed she found in a bucket of her evacuated feces which she fingered through.
We know Jan is an odd duck, a hateful, judgmental (heavy on the 'mental), insulting holier-than-thou fanatical Christian who is one can shy of a six pack.....could it be due to plain 'ole genes or is it her amalgam-mouth that has makes her appear crazy as a loon?
(Que Jan to post a diatribe of unattributed quotes from someone, about something....add a bunch of newsgroups that have absolutely no interest in her 'issues'.....and rave on that anyone who complains is part of a *gang*)
Chortle, chortle.....gotta get another cup of coffee over the reality of it all. What an insane world!
>>"Sdores" <sdo...@bellsouth.net> wrote in message >>news:ylL0h.18458$kI6.12507@bignews4.bellsouth.net... >>> Good post, I would like to see more positive things posted about >>> different >>> things too. But shouldn't the title be different then having a name of >>> a >>> person in it? I took the name out. UM MOM Susan
>>lol. Proving you are once again a proven*gang* member. Leaving my name >>in........................
> Maybe I'm a bit slow today, but could you explain how removing my name > became "Leaving [your] name in"? "Sdores" <sdo...@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
>>>"Sdores" <sdo...@bellsouth.net> wrote in message >>>news:ylL0h.18458$kI6.12507@bignews4.bellsouth.net... >>>> Good post, I would like to see more positive things posted about >>>> different >>>> things too. But shouldn't the title be different then having a name of >>>> a >>>> person in it? I took the name out. UM MOM Susan
>>>lol. Proving you are once again a proven*gang* member. Leaving my name >>>in........................
>> Maybe I'm a bit slow today, but could you explain how removing my name >> became "Leaving [your] name in"?
|
