Peter B. wrote: > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote > > Peter B. wrote: > >> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote: > >> > Peter B. wrote: > >> >> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote: > >> >> > Peter B. wrote: > >> >> >> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote: > >> >> >> > Peter B. wrote: > >> >> >> >> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote > >> >> >> >> > Peter B. wrote: > >> >> >> >> >> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> > It is when we are prosperous and hopeful that we become > >> >> >> >> >> > healthier (hungrier) than ever.
> >> >> >> >> >> Proof is required else you look like a buffoon.
> >> >> >> >> > Health tips require no proof.
> >> >> >> >> > Instead, they are realizable experiences.
> >> >> >> >> Then why are you so emaciated when you are so poor?
> >> >> >> > Folks who are in need of clothing and shelter are no longer > >> >> >> > as able to > >> >> >> > eat the amount of food they need (32 oz/day) because of not > >> >> >> > being as hungry (i.e. not as healthy).
> >> >> >> > Otoh, those prospered and filled with hope by GOD are > >> >> >> > healthier (hungrier) than ever so that they are able to eat and thereby > >> >> >> > not look emaciated.
> >> >> >> Yet you look emaciated.
> >> >> > Lie.
> >> >> > Emaciated (i.e. starving) folks have thinning hair and loss of > >> >> > muscle.
> >> >> Some do, not all.
> >> > Incorrect.
> >> > There is loss of muscle and thinning of hair in all who are truly > >> > starving (i.e. emaciated).
> >> Wrong, a simple walk down the halls of any community hospital will > >> dispute that.
> > Emaciated folks are not found in the halls of community hospitals in > > the U.S. but rather in famine-stricken areas of third world countries > > where starvation is endemic:
May GOD give you, Peter B., a new heart and a new spirit (Ezekiel 11:19-20 and 36:26) so that you would be born again of water and Spirit (John 3:3 and 3:5) so that you would come to trust the truth, Who is Jesus:
> On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 22:12:16 -0700 (PDT), "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
> <lo...@thetruth.com> wrote: > >Yes, the Holy Spirit is absolutely right to convict you:
> You are a criminal stalker. > -- > Interview mit dem Autor der "Reimbibel" > Kultur und Wissen > Auslöser war der Besuch von Benedikt XVI. in Auschwitz-Birkenauhttp://www.nrhz.de/flyer/beitrag.php?id=14183
On Oct 17, 8:47 am, Happy Oyster <happy.oys...@ariplex.com> wrote:
> a) You just do not understand it.
Perhaps you are not getting your point across ..... just what is your point?
> b) Where is YOUR contribution to this news-group?
Where is anyone's contribution to this group? Chung posts his usual stuff, a few others pipe up like the iron guy and monkfish with his questions and then all the ones who respond to Chung. I guess if you think pointing out the absurdity of Chung posts and answering others who are critical of you is contributing, then I do some of what you do. I know you have commented about the value of what you post, but that is only just what you say. The thing about these groups is that anyone can say anything.
From a medical point of view, this group is now a joke and find it hard that any sane person could not realize that and if they do not, then why should they listen to you and not Chung and those who are critical of you?
On Sat, 17 Oct 2009 07:55:43 -0700 (PDT), QJ <qjmac...@gmail.com> wrote: >On Oct 17, 8:47 am, Happy Oyster <happy.oys...@ariplex.com> wrote:
>> a) You just do not understand it.
>Perhaps you are not getting your point across ..... just what is your >point?
>> b) Where is YOUR contribution to this news-group?
>Where is anyone's contribution to this group? Chung posts his usual >stuff, a few others pipe up like the iron guy and monkfish with his >questions and then all the ones who respond to Chung. I guess if you >think pointing out the absurdity of Chung posts and answering others >who are critical of you is contributing, then I do some of what you >do. I know you have commented about the value of what you post, but >that is only just what you say. The thing about these groups is that >anyone can say anything.
>From a medical point of view, this group is now a joke and find it >hard that any sane person could not realize that and if they do not, >then why should they listen to you and not Chung and those who are >critical of you?
You should read more and think a bit more. . -- How a sect kills YOUR children
On Sat, 17 Oct 2009 11:38:46 -0700 (PDT), QJ <qjmac...@gmail.com> wrote: >On Oct 17, 1:18 pm, Happy Oyster <happy.oys...@ariplex.com> wrote:
>> You should read more and think a bit more.
>Wow, if you think there is valuable medical information in this group, >then you advice is not serious and as useless as Chung's
You are deep in the quicksand now...
[*QUOTE*] ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Neue Erkenntnis in der Krebsforschung bricht mit bisherigen Erfahrungen
Bereits in einem sehr frühen Erkrankungsstadium beginnt Metastasenbildung
Bei Krebserkrankungen verursacht in der Regel nicht der Tumor an sich schwerwiegende Folgen, sondern Metastasen. Krebspatienten sterben meist nicht am Ersttumor, sondern an den Tochtergeschwülsten.
Dr. Jochen Geigl vom Institut für Humangenetik ist im Zuge seiner Forschungsarbeiten auf ein völlig neues Ergebnis gestoßen: Metastasierung beginnt bereits in einem sehr frühen Stadium.
Bisher ging die Wissenschaft davon aus, dass einzelne Krebszellen eines Tumors schrittweise weiter entarten, bis sie schließlich ihren Weg in andere Organe suchen, um dort aggressive Tochtergeschwülste zu bilden.
"Nach den neuesten Erkenntnissen beginnt die Metastasierung bereits sehr früh. Die meisten Tumor-Tochterzellen bleiben ihr Leben lang schlafend und beginnen nicht zu wuchern. In manchen Fällen aber leider nicht", erklärt Jochen Geigl.
Bisher hielt man daran fest, dass Metastasenbildung erst zu einem späten Zeitpunkt der Krebserkrankung auftritt. Gestärkt wurde dieses Bild, dass Patienten mit größeren Tumoren eher Metastasen entwickelt haben als in Fällen mit kleineren Tumoren.
Die nächsten, intensiven Forschungsarbeiten haben nun die Frage im Zentrum, unter welchen Bedingungen ein Wuchern ausgelöst wird.
Für Jochen Geigl gibt es dafür zwei Möglichkeiten: "Entweder sendet der Ersttumor Signale zum Wachstum aus oder die Botenstoffe kommen aus der Umgebung der Tochter-Tumorzellen."
Ziel der Forschungsarbeiten ist es herauszufinden, unter welchen Bedingungen man den Ruhezustand der Tumor-Tochterzellen dauerhaft erzwingen kann. Dann könnten Medikamente entwickelt werden, die die wachstumshemmenden Botenstoffe hemmen.
Dr. Jochen Geigl hat im Rahmen eines Stipendiums bei Prof. Klein an der LMU München ein Mausmodell für Brustkrebs etabliert. Über die Ergebnisse der Forschungsarbeit wurde heuer in der Coverstory der Fachzeitschrift "Cancer Cell" berichtet, die zu den international renommiertesten Journalen für Krebsforscher gehört.
Krebsübertragung durch Transplantation
Jochen Geigl hat in diesen Studien nachgewiesen, dass bereits ein paar Dutzend Zellen ausreichen, um im gesunden Tier die tödliche Krankheit auszulösen. Bekannt ist das Risiko einer Krebserkrankung von Organstransplantationen.
Neues Wissen für Patienten von großem Nutzen: In Österreich einmalige Gen-Untersuchungen werden routinemäßig in Graz angeboten
Dr. Jochen Geigl arbeitet gemeinsam mit Univ.-Prof. Dr. Michael Speicher, dem Leiter des Instituts für Humangenetik an der Med Uni Graz, zusammen. Das vom Institut koordinierte EU-Projekt Geninca (www.geninca.eu) schafft die idealen Voraussetzungen, um dieses hochinteressante Forschungsfeld weiterzuführen und die neuesten Erkenntnisse auch bei der Beratung von Patienten anzuwenden.
In Zusammenarbeit mit Onkologen und Gynäkologen des LKH-Univ.-Klinikums Graz wurden regelmäßige Sprechstunden eingerichtet, wo z.B. Patienten mit vererbbaren Tumoren, insbes. Brust- und Darmkrebs, beraten werden.
"Diese Früherkennung ist ein besonders wichtiger Schritt für die Krebsmedizin. Und für bereits Erkrankte kann mit Hilfe einer Gen-Analyse eine optimale Therapie zusammengestellt werden", erklärt Jochen Geigl.
Service-Box: Sprechstunden am LKH-Univ.-Klinikum Graz für Patienten mit familiärer Tumorbelastung:
Gynäkologisch-Genetische Sprechstunde Brustambulanz Klinische Abteilung für Gynäkologie, Universitätsfrauenklinik Jeden Dienstag, 13.00 Uhr-15.00 Uhr Kontaktaufnahme (Frau OA Dr. Pristauz): Tel. +43 316 385 83006 Fax: +43 316 385 4695 E-Mail: gyn.obgyn [bat] meduni-graz.at
Onko-Genetische Sprechstunde Ambulanz der Klinischen Abteilung für Onkologie der Universitätsklinik für Innere Medizin Jeden zweiten Montag, 14.00 Uhr-16.00 Uhr Kontaktaufnahme (Frau OA Dr. Hegenbarth, Prof. Dr. Bauernhofer): Tel. +43 316 385 3028 Fax: +43 316 385 3355 E-Mail: onkologie [bat] klinikum-graz.at
Weitere Informationen: Dr. Jochen Geigl Institut für Humangenetik, Med Uni Graz E-Mail: jochen.ge...@meduni-graz.at Tel: +43-316-380-4111
Die Ergebnisse von Dr. Jochen Geigl bringen völlig neue Erkenntnisse in der Krebsforschung: Metastasen entstehen bereits zu einem Zeitpunkt, wo der Krebsherd noch winzig ist. In weiterer Folge kommt es zum Ausstreuen von Tumor-Tochterzellen.
Jedoch verweilen sie in einer Art Ruhezustand, bis die Tumorzellen tatsächlich beginnen sich zu vermehren. Nun arbeitet das Team vom Institut für Humangenetik daran herauszufinden, unter welchen Bedingungen man den Ruhezustand der Tumor-Tochterzellen dauerhaft erzwingen kann. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- [*/QUOTE*]
Quelle:
tatsächlich beginnen sich zu vermehren. Nun arbeitet das Team vom Institut für Humangenetik daran herauszufinden, unter welchen Bedingungen man den Ruhezustand der Tumor-Tochterzellen dauerhaft erzwingen kann. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- [*/QUOTE*]
> You need to come clean about your life before all peoples. There is a > sinful cloud over your head. Your reputation is mud, and your employment > history sucks big time. Confess your sins.
On Oct 15, 9:46 pm, "Peter B." <i...@i-brag.com> wrote:
> > Peter B. wrote: > >> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote: > >> > Peter B. wrote: > >> >> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote: > >> >> > Peter B. wrote: > >> >> >> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote > >> >> >> > Peter B. wrote: > >> >> >> >> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> >> >> >> >> > It is when we are prosperous and hopeful that we become > >> >> >> >> > healthier (hungrier) than ever.
> >> >> >> >> Proof is required else you look like a buffoon.
> >> >> >> > Health tips require no proof.
> >> >> >> > Instead, they are realizable experiences.
> >> >> >> Then why are you so emaciated when you are so poor?
> >> >> > Folks who are in need of clothing and shelter are no longer as > >> >> > able > >> >> > to > >> >> > eat the amount of food they need (32 oz/day) because of not > >> >> > being > >> >> > as > >> >> > hungry (i.e. not as healthy).
> >> >> > Otoh, those prospered and filled with hope by GOD are healthier > >> >> > (hungrier) than ever so that they are able to eat and thereby > >> >> > not > >> >> > look > >> >> > emaciated.
> >> >> Yet you look emaciated.
> >> > Lie.
> >> > Emaciated (i.e. starving) folks have thinning hair and loss of > >> > muscle.
> >> Some do, not all.
> > Incorrect.
> > There is loss of muscle and thinning of hair in all who are truly > > starving (i.e. emaciated).
> Wrong, a simple walk down the halls of any community hospital will > dispute that. > You need to come clean about your life before all peoples. There is a > sinful cloud over your head. Your reputation is mud, and your employment > history sucks big time. Confess your sins.
> Explain your statement of Religion- Christian Other. > Explaing your affiliation with the SDA
> > You need to come clean about your life before all peoples. There is a > > sinful cloud over your head. Your reputation is mud, and your employment > > history sucks big time. Confess your sins.
> On Oct 15, 9:46 pm, "Peter B." <i...@i-brag.com> wrote:
> > > Peter B. wrote: > > >> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote: > > >> > Peter B. wrote: > > >> >> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote: > > >> >> > Peter B. wrote: > > >> >> >> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote > > >> >> >> > Peter B. wrote: > > >> >> >> >> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > >> >> >> >> > It is when we are prosperous and hopeful that we become > > >> >> >> >> > healthier (hungrier) than ever.
> > >> >> >> >> Proof is required else you look like a buffoon.
> > >> >> >> > Health tips require no proof.
> > >> >> >> > Instead, they are realizable experiences.
> > >> >> >> Then why are you so emaciated when you are so poor?
> > >> >> > Folks who are in need of clothing and shelter are no longer as > > >> >> > able > > >> >> > to > > >> >> > eat the amount of food they need (32 oz/day) because of not > > >> >> > being > > >> >> > as > > >> >> > hungry (i.e. not as healthy).
> > >> >> > Otoh, those prospered and filled with hope by GOD are healthier > > >> >> > (hungrier) than ever so that they are able to eat and thereby > > >> >> > not > > >> >> > look > > >> >> > emaciated.
> > >> >> Yet you look emaciated.
> > >> > Lie.
> > >> > Emaciated (i.e. starving) folks have thinning hair and loss of > > >> > muscle.
> > >> Some do, not all.
> > > Incorrect.
> > > There is loss of muscle and thinning of hair in all who are truly > > > starving (i.e. emaciated).
> > Wrong, a simple walk down the halls of any community hospital will > > dispute that. > > You need to come clean about your life before all peoples. There is a > > sinful cloud over your head. Your reputation is mud, and your employment > > history sucks big time. Confess your sins.
> > Explain your statement of Religion- Christian Other. > > Explaing your affiliation with the SDA
> > Snipped deceitful comments.- Hide quoted text -
Self-righteousness (also called sententiousness, holier-than-thou[1]) is a feeling of smug moral superiority[2] derived from a sense that one's beliefs, actions, or affiliations are of greater virtue than those of the average person.
The term "self-righteous" is often considered derogatory (see, for example, journalist and essayist James Fallows' description of self- righteousness in regards to Nobel Peace Prize winners) particularly because self-righteous individuals are often thought to exhibit hypocrisy, an idea similar to that of the Freudian defense mechanism of reaction formation. The connection between self-righteousness and hypocrisy predates Freud's views, however, as evidenced by the 1899 book Good Mrs. Hypocrite: A Study in Self-Righteousness, by the pseudonymous author "Rita."
> On Nov 5, 4:26 am, pautrey2 <rpautr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > You need to come clean about your life before all peoples. There is a > > > sinful cloud over your head. Your reputation is mud, and your employment > > > history sucks big time. Confess your sins.
> > On Oct 15, 9:46 pm, "Peter B." <i...@i-brag.com> wrote:
> > > > Peter B. wrote: > > > >> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote: > > > >> > Peter B. wrote: > > > >> >> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote: > > > >> >> > Peter B. wrote: > > > >> >> >> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote > > > >> >> >> > Peter B. wrote: > > > >> >> >> >> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > > >> >> >> >> > It is when we are prosperous and hopeful that we become > > > >> >> >> >> > healthier (hungrier) than ever.
> > > >> >> >> >> Proof is required else you look like a buffoon.
> > > >> >> >> > Health tips require no proof.
> > > >> >> >> > Instead, they are realizable experiences.
> > > >> >> >> Then why are you so emaciated when you are so poor?
> > > >> >> > Folks who are in need of clothing and shelter are no longer as > > > >> >> > able > > > >> >> > to > > > >> >> > eat the amount of food they need (32 oz/day) because of not > > > >> >> > being > > > >> >> > as > > > >> >> > hungry (i.e. not as healthy).
> > > >> >> > Otoh, those prospered and filled with hope by GOD are healthier > > > >> >> > (hungrier) than ever so that they are able to eat and thereby > > > >> >> > not > > > >> >> > look > > > >> >> > emaciated.
> > > >> >> Yet you look emaciated.
> > > >> > Lie.
> > > >> > Emaciated (i.e. starving) folks have thinning hair and loss of > > > >> > muscle.
> > > >> Some do, not all.
> > > > Incorrect.
> > > > There is loss of muscle and thinning of hair in all who are truly > > > > starving (i.e. emaciated).
> > > Wrong, a simple walk down the halls of any community hospital will > > > dispute that. > > > You need to come clean about your life before all peoples. There is a > > > sinful cloud over your head. Your reputation is mud, and your employment > > > history sucks big time. Confess your sins.
> > > Explain your statement of Religion- Christian Other. > > > Explaing your affiliation with the SDA
> > > Snipped deceitful comments.- Hide quoted text -
> Self-righteousness (also called sententiousness, holier-than-thou[1]) > is a feeling of smug moral superiority[2] derived from a sense that > one's beliefs, actions, or affiliations are of greater virtue than > those of the average person.
> The term "self-righteous" is often considered derogatory (see, for > example, journalist and essayist James Fallows' description of self- > righteousness in regards to Nobel Peace Prize winners) particularly > because self-righteous individuals are often thought to exhibit > hypocrisy, an idea similar to that of the Freudian defense mechanism > of reaction formation. The connection between self-righteousness and > hypocrisy predates Freud's views, however, as evidenced by the 1899 > book Good Mrs. Hypocrite: A Study in Self-Righteousness, by the > pseudonymous author "Rita."- Hide quoted text -
> On Nov 5, 4:40 pm, pautrey2 <rpautr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Nov 5, 4:26 am, pautrey2 <rpautr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > You need to come clean about your life before all peoples. There is a > > > > sinful cloud over your head. Your reputation is mud, and your employment > > > > history sucks big time. Confess your sins.
> > > On Oct 15, 9:46 pm, "Peter B." <i...@i-brag.com> wrote:
> > > > > Peter B. wrote: > > > > >> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote: > > > > >> > Peter B. wrote: > > > > >> >> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote: > > > > >> >> > Peter B. wrote: > > > > >> >> >> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote > > > > >> >> >> > Peter B. wrote: > > > > >> >> >> >> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > > > >> >> >> >> > It is when we are prosperous and hopeful that we become > > > > >> >> >> >> > healthier (hungrier) than ever.
> > > > >> >> >> >> Proof is required else you look like a buffoon.
> > > > >> >> >> > Health tips require no proof.
> > > > >> >> >> > Instead, they are realizable experiences.
> > > > >> >> >> Then why are you so emaciated when you are so poor?
> > > > >> >> > Folks who are in need of clothing and shelter are no longer as > > > > >> >> > able > > > > >> >> > to > > > > >> >> > eat the amount of food they need (32 oz/day) because of not > > > > >> >> > being > > > > >> >> > as > > > > >> >> > hungry (i.e. not as healthy).
> > > > >> >> > Otoh, those prospered and filled with hope by GOD are healthier > > > > >> >> > (hungrier) than ever so that they are able to eat and thereby > > > > >> >> > not > > > > >> >> > look > > > > >> >> > emaciated.
> > > > >> >> Yet you look emaciated.
> > > > >> > Lie.
> > > > >> > Emaciated (i.e. starving) folks have thinning hair and loss of > > > > >> > muscle.
> > > > >> Some do, not all.
> > > > > Incorrect.
> > > > > There is loss of muscle and thinning of hair in all who are truly > > > > > starving (i.e. emaciated).
> > > > Wrong, a simple walk down the halls of any community hospital will > > > > dispute that. > > > > You need to come clean about your life before all peoples. There is a > > > > sinful cloud over your head. Your reputation is mud, and your employment > > > > history sucks big time. Confess your sins.
> > > > Explain your statement of Religion- Christian Other. > > > > Explaing your affiliation with the SDA
> > Self-righteousness (also called sententiousness, holier-than-thou[1]) > > is a feeling of smug moral superiority[2] derived from a sense that > > one's beliefs, actions, or affiliations are of greater virtue than > > those of the average person.
> > The term "self-righteous" is often considered derogatory (see, for > > example, journalist and essayist James Fallows' description of self- > > righteousness in regards to Nobel Peace Prize winners) particularly > > because self-righteous individuals are often thought to exhibit > > hypocrisy, an idea similar to that of the Freudian defense mechanism > > of reaction formation. The connection between self-righteousness and > > hypocrisy predates Freud's views, however, as evidenced by the 1899 > > book Good Mrs. Hypocrite: A Study in Self-Righteousness, by the > > pseudonymous author "Rita."- Hide quoted text -
May GOD give you, neighbor, a new heart and a new spirit (Ezekiel 11:19-20 and 36:26) so that you would be born again of water and Spirit (John 3:3 and 3:5) so that you would come to trust the truth, Who is Jesus:
Self-righteousness (also called sententiousness, holier-than-thou[1]) is a feeling of smug moral superiority[2] derived from a sense that one's beliefs, actions, or affiliations are of greater virtue than those of the average person.
The term "self-righteous" is often considered derogatory (see, for example, journalist and essayist James Fallows' description of self- righteousness in regards to Nobel Peace Prize winners) particularly because self-righteous individuals are often thought to exhibit hypocrisy, an idea similar to that of the Freudian defense mechanism of reaction formation. The connection between self-righteousness and hypocrisy predates Freud's views, however, as evidenced by the 1899 book Good Mrs. Hypocrite: A Study in Self-Righteousness, by the pseudonymous author "Rita."
On Nov 5, 9:24 pm, pautrey2 <rpautr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Nov 5, 9:24 pm, pautrey2 <rpautr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Nov 5, 4:40 pm, pautrey2 <rpautr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Nov 5, 4:26 am, pautrey2 <rpautr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > You need to come clean about your life before all peoples. There is a > > > > > sinful cloud over your head. Your reputation is mud, and your employment > > > > > history sucks big time. Confess your sins.
> > > > On Oct 15, 9:46 pm, "Peter B." <i...@i-brag.com> wrote:
> > > > > > Peter B. wrote: > > > > > >> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote: > > > > > >> > Peter B. wrote: > > > > > >> >> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote: > > > > > >> >> > Peter B. wrote: > > > > > >> >> >> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote > > > > > >> >> >> > Peter B. wrote: > > > > > >> >> >> >> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > > > > >> >> >> >> > It is when we are prosperous and hopeful that we become > > > > > >> >> >> >> > healthier (hungrier) than ever.
> > > > > >> >> >> >> Proof is required else you look like a buffoon.
> > > > > >> >> >> > Health tips require no proof.
> > > > > >> >> >> > Instead, they are realizable experiences.
> > > > > >> >> >> Then why are you so emaciated when you are so poor?
> > > > > >> >> > Folks who are in need of clothing and shelter are no longer as > > > > > >> >> > able > > > > > >> >> > to > > > > > >> >> > eat the amount of food they need (32 oz/day) because of not > > > > > >> >> > being > > > > > >> >> > as > > > > > >> >> > hungry (i.e. not as healthy).
> > > > > >> >> > Otoh, those prospered and filled with hope by GOD are healthier > > > > > >> >> > (hungrier) than ever so that they are able to eat and thereby > > > > > >> >> > not > > > > > >> >> > look > > > > > >> >> > emaciated.
> > > > > >> >> Yet you look emaciated.
> > > > > >> > Lie.
> > > > > >> > Emaciated (i.e. starving) folks have thinning hair and loss of > > > > > >> > muscle.
> > > > > >> Some do, not all.
> > > > > > Incorrect.
> > > > > > There is loss of muscle and thinning of hair in all who are truly > > > > > > starving (i.e. emaciated).
> > > > > Wrong, a simple walk down the halls of any community hospital will > > > > > dispute that. > > > > > You need to come clean about your life before all peoples. There is a > > > > > sinful cloud over your head. Your reputation is mud, and your employment > > > > > history sucks big time. Confess your sins.
> > > > > Explain your statement of Religion- Christian Other. > > > > > Explaing your affiliation with the SDA
> > > Self-righteousness (also called sententiousness, holier-than-thou[1]) > > > is a feeling of smug moral superiority[2] derived from a sense that > > > one's beliefs, actions, or affiliations are of greater virtue than > > > those of the average person.
> > > The term "self-righteous" is often considered derogatory (see, for > > > example, journalist and essayist James Fallows' description of self- > > > righteousness in regards to Nobel Peace Prize winners) particularly > > > because self-righteous individuals are often thought to exhibit > > > hypocrisy, an idea similar to that of the Freudian defense mechanism > > > of reaction formation. The connection between self-righteousness and > > > hypocrisy predates Freud's views, however, as evidenced by the 1899 > > > book Good Mrs. Hypocrite: A Study in Self-Righteousness, by the > > > pseudonymous author "Rita."- Hide quoted text -
> Self-righteousness (also called sententiousness, holier-than-thou[1]) > is a feeling of smug moral superiority[2] derived from a sense that > one's beliefs, actions, or affiliations are of greater virtue than > those of the average person.
> The term "self-righteous" is often considered derogatory (see, for > example, journalist and essayist James Fallows' description of self- > righteousness in regards to Nobel Peace Prize winners) particularly > because self-righteous individuals are often thought to exhibit > hypocrisy, an idea similar to that of the Freudian defense mechanism > of reaction formation. The connection between self-righteousness and > hypocrisy predates Freud's views, however, as evidenced by the 1899 > book Good Mrs. Hypocrite: A Study in Self-Righteousness, by the > pseudonymous author "Rita."
> On Nov 5, 9:24 pm, pautrey2 <rpautr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Nov 5, 9:24 pm, pautrey2 <rpautr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Nov 5, 4:40 pm, pautrey2 <rpautr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > On Nov 5, 4:26 am, pautrey2 <rpautr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > You need to come clean about your life before all peoples. There is a > > > > > > sinful cloud over your head. Your reputation is mud, and your employment > > > > > > history sucks big time. Confess your sins.
> > > > > On Oct 15, 9:46 pm, "Peter B." <i...@i-brag.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > Peter B. wrote: > > > > > > >> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote: > > > > > > >> > Peter B. wrote: > > > > > > >> >> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote: > > > > > > >> >> > Peter B. wrote: > > > > > > >> >> >> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote > > > > > > >> >> >> > Peter B. wrote: > > > > > > >> >> >> >> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > > > > > >> >> >> >> > It is when we are prosperous and hopeful that we become > > > > > > >> >> >> >> > healthier (hungrier) than ever.
> > > > > > >> >> >> >> Proof is required else you look like a buffoon.
> > > > > > >> >> >> > Health tips require no proof.
> > > > > > >> >> >> > Instead, they are realizable experiences.
> > > > > > >> >> >> Then why are you so emaciated when you are so poor?
> > > > > > >> >> > Folks who are in need of clothing and shelter are no longer as > > > > > > >> >> > able > > > > > > >> >> > to > > > > > > >> >> > eat the amount of food they need (32 oz/day) because of not > > > > > > >> >> > being > > > > > > >> >> > as > > > > > > >> >> > hungry (i.e. not as healthy).
> > > > > > >> >> > Otoh, those prospered and filled with hope by GOD are healthier > > > > > > >> >> > (hungrier) than ever so that they are able to eat and thereby > > > > > > >> >> > not > > > > > > >> >> > look > > > > > > >> >> > emaciated.
> > > > > > >> >> Yet you look emaciated.
> > > > > > >> > Lie.
> > > > > > >> > Emaciated (i.e. starving) folks have thinning hair and loss of > > > > > > >> > muscle.
> > > > > > >> Some do, not all.
> > > > > > > Incorrect.
> > > > > > > There is loss of muscle and thinning of hair in all who are truly > > > > > > > starving (i.e. emaciated).
> > > > > > Wrong, a simple walk down the halls of any community hospital will > > > > > > dispute that. > > > > > > You need to come clean about your life before all peoples. There is a > > > > > > sinful cloud over your head. Your reputation is mud, and your employment > > > > > > history sucks big time. Confess your sins.
> > > > > > Explain your statement of Religion- Christian Other. > > > > > > Explaing your affiliation with the SDA
> > > > Self-righteousness (also called sententiousness, holier-than-thou[1]) > > > > is a feeling of smug moral superiority[2] derived from a sense that > > > > one's beliefs, actions, or affiliations are of greater virtue than > > > > those of the average person.
> > > > The term "self-righteous" is often considered derogatory (see, for > > > > example, journalist and essayist James Fallows' description of self- > > > > righteousness in regards to Nobel Peace Prize winners) particularly > > > > because self-righteous individuals are often thought to exhibit > > > > hypocrisy, an idea similar to that of the Freudian defense mechanism > > > > of reaction formation. The connection between self-righteousness and > > > > hypocrisy predates Freud's views, however, as evidenced by the 1899 > > > > book Good Mrs. Hypocrite: A Study in Self-Righteousness, by the > > > > pseudonymous author "Rita."- Hide quoted text -
Self-righteousness (also called sententiousness, holier-than-thou[1]) is a feeling of smug moral superiority[2] derived from a sense that one's beliefs, actions, or affiliations are of greater virtue than those of the average person.
The term "self-righteous" is often considered derogatory (see, for example, journalist and essayist James Fallows' description of self- righteousness in regards to Nobel Peace Prize winners) particularly because self-righteous individuals are often thought to exhibit hypocrisy, an idea similar to that of the Freudian defense mechanism of reaction formation. The connection between self-righteousness and hypocrisy predates Freud's views, however, as evidenced by the 1899 book Good Mrs. Hypocrite: A Study in Self-Righteousness, by the pseudonymous author "Rita."
|
