>>> When the IBM XT PC came out, there were NO clones, you dumbfuck.
>>Wrong again AlwaysWrong.
> Clones did not begin until the PC AT class machine arrived.
And again, wrong.
> Remember Heathkit? Keep using the KRW retard's nickname and see how >little respect you ever get from me, you retarded, know nothing little >bastard.
Who wants respect from someone who is always wrong, AlwaysWrong?
> >>> When the IBM XT PC came out, there were NO clones, you dumbfuck.
> >>Wrong again AlwaysWrong.
> > Clones did not begin until the PC AT class machine arrived.
> And again, wrong.
> > Remember Heathkit? Keep using the KRW retard's nickname and see how > >little respect you ever get from me, you retarded, know nothing little > >bastard.
> Who wants respect from someone who is always wrong, AlwaysWrong?
Heath/Zenith sold a XT clone with a passive back plane, and the 8088 'motherboard' function as a plug in card. I've seen several, including one that was 'Tempest' rated. That thing had well over 100 screws to hold the shielding in place. The power supply was inside another shield with feedthrough capacitors for every lead entering or leaving the box.
>> >>> When the IBM XT PC came out, there were NO clones, you dumbfuck.
>> >>Wrong again AlwaysWrong.
>> > Clones did not begin until the PC AT class machine arrived.
>> And again, wrong.
>> > Remember Heathkit? Keep using the KRW retard's nickname and see how >> >little respect you ever get from me, you retarded, know nothing little >> >bastard.
>> Who wants respect from someone who is always wrong, AlwaysWrong?
> Heath/Zenith sold a XT clone with a passive back plane, and the 8088 >'motherboard' function as a plug in card. I've seen several, including >one that was 'Tempest' rated. That thing had well over 100 screws to >hold the shielding in place. The power supply was inside another shield >with feedthrough capacitors for every lead entering or leaving the box.
> >> >>> When the IBM XT PC came out, there were NO clones, you dumbfuck.
> >> >>Wrong again AlwaysWrong.
> >> > Clones did not begin until the PC AT class machine arrived.
> >> And again, wrong.
> >> > Remember Heathkit? Keep using the KRW retard's nickname and see how > >> >little respect you ever get from me, you retarded, know nothing little > >> >bastard.
> >> Who wants respect from someone who is always wrong, AlwaysWrong?
> > Heath/Zenith sold a XT clone with a passive back plane, and the 8088 > >'motherboard' function as a plug in card. I've seen several, including > >one that was 'Tempest' rated. That thing had well over 100 screws to > >hold the shielding in place. The power supply was inside another shield > >with feedthrough capacitors for every lead entering or leaving the box.
> Compaq had 8086 clones.
I think one of the Compaq portables I have is 8 bit.
>> >>> When the IBM XT PC came out, there were NO clones, you dumbfuck.
>> >>Wrong again AlwaysWrong.
>> > Clones did not begin until the PC AT class machine arrived.
>> And again, wrong.
>> > Remember Heathkit? Keep using the KRW retard's nickname and see how >> >little respect you ever get from me, you retarded, know nothing little >> >bastard.
>> Who wants respect from someone who is always wrong, AlwaysWrong?
> Heath/Zenith sold a XT clone with a passive back plane, and the 8088 >'motherboard' function as a plug in card. I've seen several, including >one that was 'Tempest' rated. That thing had well over 100 screws to >hold the shielding in place. The power supply was inside another shield >with feedthrough capacitors for every lead entering or leaving the box.
The TEMPEST rated PCs from Heath did NOT happen until 1987.
That was LONG AFTER the XT hit the streets. SO there were clones, but only after a couple years had passed since the XT was released.
A couple years equates to the timeline of the release cycle of the AT, just like I said.
>>> >>> When the IBM XT PC came out, there were NO clones, you dumbfuck.
>>> >>Wrong again AlwaysWrong.
>>> > Clones did not begin until the PC AT class machine arrived.
>>> And again, wrong.
>>> > Remember Heathkit? Keep using the KRW retard's nickname and see how >>> >little respect you ever get from me, you retarded, know nothing little >>> >bastard.
>>> Who wants respect from someone who is always wrong, AlwaysWrong?
>> Heath/Zenith sold a XT clone with a passive back plane, and the 8088 >>'motherboard' function as a plug in card. I've seen several, including >>one that was 'Tempest' rated. That thing had well over 100 screws to >>hold the shielding in place. The power supply was inside another shield >>with feedthrough capacitors for every lead entering or leaving the box.
>Compaq had 8086 clones.
But not at the same time as the IBM XT. The clones were made in 1984.
>> >> >>> When the IBM XT PC came out, there were NO clones, you dumbfuck.
>> >> >>Wrong again AlwaysWrong.
>> >> > Clones did not begin until the PC AT class machine arrived.
>> >> And again, wrong.
>> >> > Remember Heathkit? Keep using the KRW retard's nickname and see how >> >> >little respect you ever get from me, you retarded, know nothing little >> >> >bastard.
>> >> Who wants respect from someone who is always wrong, AlwaysWrong?
>> > Heath/Zenith sold a XT clone with a passive back plane, and the 8088 >> >'motherboard' function as a plug in card. I've seen several, including >> >one that was 'Tempest' rated. That thing had well over 100 screws to >> >hold the shielding in place. The power supply was inside another shield >> >with feedthrough capacitors for every lead entering or leaving the box.
>> Compaq had 8086 clones.
> I think one of the Compaq portables I have is 8 bit.
The fact that you do not KNOW is a tell.
It tells me that you are indeed heading into your senile time.
>>> >> >>> When the IBM XT PC came out, there were NO clones, you dumbfuck.
>>> >> >>Wrong again AlwaysWrong.
>>> >> > Clones did not begin until the PC AT class machine arrived.
>>> >> And again, wrong.
>>> >> > Remember Heathkit? Keep using the KRW retard's nickname and see how >>> >> >little respect you ever get from me, you retarded, know nothing little >>> >> >bastard.
>>> >> Who wants respect from someone who is always wrong, AlwaysWrong?
>>> > Heath/Zenith sold a XT clone with a passive back plane, and the 8088 >>> >'motherboard' function as a plug in card. I've seen several, including >>> >one that was 'Tempest' rated. That thing had well over 100 screws to >>> >hold the shielding in place. The power supply was inside another shield >>> >with feedthrough capacitors for every lead entering or leaving the box.
>>> Compaq had 8086 clones.
>> I think one of the Compaq portables I have is 8 bit.
> The fact that you do not KNOW is a tell.
The fact that you're AlwaysWrong is obvious to all.
> It tells me that you are indeed heading into your senile time.
>>>> >>> When the IBM XT PC came out, there were NO clones, you dumbfuck.
>>>> >>Wrong again AlwaysWrong.
>>>> > Clones did not begin until the PC AT class machine arrived.
>>>> And again, wrong.
>>>> > Remember Heathkit? Keep using the KRW retard's nickname and see how >>>> >little respect you ever get from me, you retarded, know nothing little >>>> >bastard.
>>>> Who wants respect from someone who is always wrong, AlwaysWrong?
>>> Heath/Zenith sold a XT clone with a passive back plane, and the 8088 >>>'motherboard' function as a plug in card. I've seen several, including >>>one that was 'Tempest' rated. That thing had well over 100 screws to >>>hold the shielding in place. The power supply was inside another shield >>>with feedthrough capacitors for every lead entering or leaving the box.
>>Compaq had 8086 clones.
> But not at the same time as the IBM XT. The clones were made in 1984.
How can you ALWAYS be so WRONG, AlwaysWrong?
Nymbecile, the Compaq portable came out in 1982, *long* before the 5170.
>>>>> >>> When the IBM XT PC came out, there were NO clones, you dumbfuck.
>>>>> >>Wrong again AlwaysWrong.
>>>>> > Clones did not begin until the PC AT class machine arrived.
>>>>> And again, wrong.
>>>>> > Remember Heathkit? Keep using the KRW retard's nickname and see how >>>>> >little respect you ever get from me, you retarded, know nothing little >>>>> >bastard.
>>>>> Who wants respect from someone who is always wrong, AlwaysWrong?
>>>> Heath/Zenith sold a XT clone with a passive back plane, and the 8088 >>>>'motherboard' function as a plug in card. I've seen several, including >>>>one that was 'Tempest' rated. That thing had well over 100 screws to >>>>hold the shielding in place. The power supply was inside another shield >>>>with feedthrough capacitors for every lead entering or leaving the box.
>>>Compaq had 8086 clones.
>> But not at the same time as the IBM XT. The clones were made in 1984.
>How can you ALWAYS be so WRONG, AlwaysWrong?
>Nymbecile, the Compaq portable came out in 1982, *long* before the >5170.
WRONG, you retarded fuck!
The COMPANY was founded in '82. They had NO products that year other than in design.
The Compaq Portable came out in 1983. It *was* that 1982 design, dipshit. It had the reverse engineered BIOS. It was ANNOUNCED in November '82, but it was not released until March of '83.
Essentially, you are a fucking retard, just like I said.
>>>>>> >>> When the IBM XT PC came out, there were NO clones, you dumbfuck.
>>>>>> >>Wrong again AlwaysWrong.
>>>>>> > Clones did not begin until the PC AT class machine arrived.
>>>>>> And again, wrong.
>>>>>> > Remember Heathkit? Keep using the KRW retard's nickname and see how >>>>>> >little respect you ever get from me, you retarded, know nothing little >>>>>> >bastard.
>>>>>> Who wants respect from someone who is always wrong, AlwaysWrong?
>>>>> Heath/Zenith sold a XT clone with a passive back plane, and the 8088 >>>>>'motherboard' function as a plug in card. I've seen several, including >>>>>one that was 'Tempest' rated. That thing had well over 100 screws to >>>>>hold the shielding in place. The power supply was inside another shield >>>>>with feedthrough capacitors for every lead entering or leaving the box.
>>>>Compaq had 8086 clones.
>>> But not at the same time as the IBM XT. The clones were made in 1984.
>>How can you ALWAYS be so WRONG, AlwaysWrong?
>>Nymbecile, the Compaq portable came out in 1982, *long* before the >>5170.
> WRONG, you retarded fuck!
Wrong, Nymbecile.
> The COMPANY was founded in '82. They had NO products that year other >than in design.
DO yourself a favor and look it up.
> The Compaq Portable came out in 1983. It *was* that 1982 design, >dipshit. It had the reverse engineered BIOS. It was ANNOUNCED in >November '82, but it was not released until March of '83.
It was available in November of '82, AlwaysWrong.
> Essentially, you are a fucking retard, just like I said.
AlwaysLiar, you just said that there were no clones before '84. No do all of us a favor and commit suicide.
>> >> >>> When the IBM XT PC came out, there were NO clones, you dumbfuck.
>> >> >>Wrong again AlwaysWrong.
>> >> > Clones did not begin until the PC AT class machine arrived.
>> >> And again, wrong.
>> >> > Remember Heathkit? Keep using the KRW retard's nickname and see how >> >> >little respect you ever get from me, you retarded, know nothing little >> >> >bastard.
>> >> Who wants respect from someone who is always wrong, AlwaysWrong?
>> > Heath/Zenith sold a XT clone with a passive back plane, and the 8088 >> >'motherboard' function as a plug in card. I've seen several, including >> >one that was 'Tempest' rated. That thing had well over 100 screws to >> >hold the shielding in place. The power supply was inside another shield >> >with feedthrough capacitors for every lead entering or leaving the box.
>> Compaq had 8086 clones.
> I think one of the Compaq portables I have is 8 bit.
For some reason i thought that was Corona (later Cordata). Alas long defunct.
> >>> >> >>> When the IBM XT PC came out, there were NO clones, you dumbfuck.
> >>> >> >>Wrong again AlwaysWrong.
> >>> >> > Clones did not begin until the PC AT class machine arrived.
> >>> >> And again, wrong.
> >>> >> > Remember Heathkit? Keep using the KRW retard's nickname and see how > >>> >> >little respect you ever get from me, you retarded, know nothing little > >>> >> >bastard.
> >>> >> Who wants respect from someone who is always wrong, AlwaysWrong?
> >>> > Heath/Zenith sold a XT clone with a passive back plane, and the 8088 > >>> >'motherboard' function as a plug in card. I've seen several, including > >>> >one that was 'Tempest' rated. That thing had well over 100 screws to > >>> >hold the shielding in place. The power supply was inside another shield > >>> >with feedthrough capacitors for every lead entering or leaving the box.
> >>> Compaq had 8086 clones.
> >> I think one of the Compaq portables I have is 8 bit.
> > The fact that you do not KNOW is a tell.
> The fact that you're AlwaysWrong is obvious to all.
The fact is that Ii haven't looked at it in almost ten years and don't know which ones I got rid of after one hurricane damaged the roof. If you want to know, you can go in there and look for it.
> > It tells me that you are indeed heading into your senile time.
|
