<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
  <title>misc.legal Google Group</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.nf/group/misc.legal</link>
  <description>Legalities and the ethics of law.</description>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
  <title>Daniel Ruth and Elaine Silvestrini are wrong. First post is withdrawn now.</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.nf/group/misc.legal/browse_thread/thread/646112371c7ec3b4/62f3ec5c8d498b29?show_docid=62f3ec5c8d498b29</link>
  <description>
  Daniel Ruth and Elaine Silvestrini are wrong. Here is a graphic image &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://rexcurry.net/elaine-silvestrini-benito-mussolini.jpg&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; Upon further reflection, the initial post is withdrawn and a sincere &lt;br&gt; apology is extended to the noted historian Dr. Curry. &lt;br&gt; Daniel Ruth, who used to work for the Tampa Tribune Newspaper, is notorious
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.nf/group/misc.legal/browse_thread/thread/646112371c7ec3b4/62f3ec5c8d498b29?show_docid=62f3ec5c8d498b29</guid>
  <author>
  x...@xoxo.com
  (XoXo)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 12:26:21 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: #How Lehman scammed everyone on the way down</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.nf/group/misc.legal/browse_thread/thread/b194a603c33932c0/e7fc31f8fddfea0d?show_docid=e7fc31f8fddfea0d</link>
  <description>
  David Bernier wrote &lt;br&gt; It was just a comment on that bit of his. &lt;br&gt; I&#39;ve never been into mindlessly staying on topic in usenet.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.nf/group/misc.legal/browse_thread/thread/b194a603c33932c0/e7fc31f8fddfea0d?show_docid=e7fc31f8fddfea0d</guid>
  <author>
  rod.speed....@gmail.com
  (Rod Speed)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 05:20:55 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>is the job description of &quot;interpret&quot; even in the Constitution? #19 logic look at USA Constitution</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.nf/group/misc.legal/browse_thread/thread/933d811393d3a8ac/ebe04937dddbb874?show_docid=ebe04937dddbb874</link>
  <description>
  One exasperating trouble I am finding with Wikipedia on the USA &lt;br&gt; Constitution is lack of &lt;br&gt; stating what the Constitution is. They dive into commentary, but fail &lt;br&gt; to list what Article III &lt;br&gt; even says. I find this extremely annoying since the Constitution does &lt;br&gt; not take up all that &lt;br&gt; much space. So why not at least list or cite, word for word, of what
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.nf/group/misc.legal/browse_thread/thread/933d811393d3a8ac/ebe04937dddbb874?show_docid=ebe04937dddbb874</guid>
  <author>
  plutonium.archime...@gmail.com
  (Archimedes Plutonium)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 05:05:46 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: 80% Opposition To Corp. Shill Speech = Constitutional Amendment</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.nf/group/misc.legal/browse_thread/thread/20a6106f490f7169/27541c5e9b8cc724?show_docid=27541c5e9b8cc724</link>
  <description>
  Bullshit. By making this ruling, the Supreme Court has ignored over a &lt;br&gt; century of precedent. This isn&#39;t a legal decision, it&#39;s legislating &lt;br&gt; from the bench. &lt;br&gt; ============================== ============================== ======== &lt;br&gt; Which is OK when Republicans do it. &lt;br&gt; Jim
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.nf/group/misc.legal/browse_thread/thread/20a6106f490f7169/27541c5e9b8cc724?show_docid=27541c5e9b8cc724</guid>
  <author>
  claviusnospamdam...@cablespeed.com
  (Clave)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 02:32:08 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: leftards whine about the Supremes upholding free speech</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.nf/group/misc.legal/browse_thread/thread/20a6106f490f7169/358719e1675c3a3b?show_docid=358719e1675c3a3b</link>
  <description>
  Harold Burton &amp;lt;hal.i.bur...@hotmail.com&amp;gt; wrote in &lt;br&gt; Hey, snicker! Your opponents are being ignorant. Why not take the &lt;br&gt; opportunity not to top them in their misunderstanding? &lt;br&gt; But you just couldn&#39;t do it, could you? &lt;br&gt; The people who oppose the Courts decision in _Citizens United_ aren&#39;t &lt;br&gt; strict constructionists: the issues in the case can&#39;t be decided by
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.nf/group/misc.legal/browse_thread/thread/20a6106f490f7169/358719e1675c3a3b?show_docid=358719e1675c3a3b</guid>
  <author>
  a...@b.com
  (Deadrat)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 02:24:22 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: leftards whine about the Supremes upholding free speech</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.nf/group/misc.legal/browse_thread/thread/20a6106f490f7169/fef73ae61e2f2ba8?show_docid=fef73ae61e2f2ba8</link>
  <description>
  In article &amp;lt;ho6ifl02...@news3.newsguy.com &amp;gt;, &lt;br&gt; But, but, but, that can&#39;t be right. These leftarded shitheads were &lt;br&gt; advertised as &amp;quot;law evolvers&amp;quot;. Surely you must be mistaken! &lt;br&gt; Funny how when the shoe is on the other foot leftards suddenly become &lt;br&gt; strict constructionists. &lt;br&gt; snicker.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.nf/group/misc.legal/browse_thread/thread/20a6106f490f7169/fef73ae61e2f2ba8?show_docid=fef73ae61e2f2ba8</guid>
  <author>
  hal.i.bur...@hotmail.com
  (Harold Burton)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 02:10:30 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Leftards turn to whine about Supremes &quot;legislating from the bench&quot;</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.nf/group/misc.legal/browse_thread/thread/20a6106f490f7169/0996df2f6dc52cab?show_docid=0996df2f6dc52cab</link>
  <description>
  In article &lt;br&gt; &amp;lt;3af383a1-c62d-437b-9dc9-746b3 644e...@t32g2000prg.googlegrou ps.com&amp;gt;, &lt;br&gt; Much like Roe vs. Wade . . . or Brown vs. Board of Education of Topeka. &lt;br&gt; I&#39;ve heard that complaint before. &lt;br&gt; snicker.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.nf/group/misc.legal/browse_thread/thread/20a6106f490f7169/0996df2f6dc52cab?show_docid=0996df2f6dc52cab</guid>
  <author>
  hal.i.bur...@hotmail.com
  (Harold Burton)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 02:07:14 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: 80% Opposition To Corp. Shill Speech = Constitutional Amendment</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.nf/group/misc.legal/browse_thread/thread/20a6106f490f7169/295e49a30784d850?show_docid=295e49a30784d850</link>
  <description>
  ab28-557dd6291...@x1g2000prb.g ooglegroups.com... &lt;br&gt; But, but, but, but that can&#39;t be right. These rightarded shitheads were &lt;br&gt; advertised as &amp;quot;strict constructionist&amp;quot;. Surely you must be mistaken!
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.nf/group/misc.legal/browse_thread/thread/20a6106f490f7169/295e49a30784d850?show_docid=295e49a30784d850</guid>
  <author>
  mik...@verizon.net
  (Michael Coburn)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 01:51:49 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: 80% Opposition To Corp. Shill Speech = Constitutional Amendment</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.nf/group/misc.legal/browse_thread/thread/20a6106f490f7169/fa39d49c875461b1?show_docid=fa39d49c875461b1</link>
  <description>
  Bullshit. By making this ruling, the Supreme Court has ignored over a &lt;br&gt; century of precedent. This isn&#39;t a legal decision, it&#39;s legislating &lt;br&gt; from the bench.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.nf/group/misc.legal/browse_thread/thread/20a6106f490f7169/fa39d49c875461b1?show_docid=fa39d49c875461b1</guid>
  <author>
  sbm2...@telus.net
  (Siobhan Medeiros)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 01:38:53 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: #How Lehman scammed everyone on the way down</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.nf/group/misc.legal/browse_thread/thread/b194a603c33932c0/b339e6809e6507fe?show_docid=b339e6809e6507fe</link>
  <description>
  How is that relevant to the topic being discussed? &lt;br&gt; David Bernier
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.nf/group/misc.legal/browse_thread/thread/b194a603c33932c0/b339e6809e6507fe?show_docid=b339e6809e6507fe</guid>
  <author>
  david...@videotron.ca
  (David Bernier)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 01:37:59 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Developmental trauma disorder, Childhood Stress/Autoimmune Diseases, The Pope, the letter and the child sex claim</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.nf/group/misc.legal/browse_thread/thread/3bc4a5ab86fb4c55/7fe0fbaf0e61d2c0?show_docid=7fe0fbaf0e61d2c0</link>
  <description>
  &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2005/apr/24/children.childprotection1&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.traumacenter.org/products/pdf_files/Preprint_Dev_Trauma_Disorder.pdf&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.psychosomaticmedicine.org/cgi/content/abstract/71/2/243&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://eassurvey.wordpress.com/2010/03/22/developmental-trauma-disorder-childhood-stressautoimmune-diseases-pope/&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.nf/group/misc.legal/browse_thread/thread/3bc4a5ab86fb4c55/7fe0fbaf0e61d2c0?show_docid=7fe0fbaf0e61d2c0</guid>
  <author>
  ritualabuseli...@aol.com
  (crime reporter)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 01:32:37 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Ore. lawsuit claims Boy Scouts sex abuse coverup</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.nf/group/misc.legal/browse_thread/thread/13112538c7257b84/fc077ed9c10b7e2d?show_docid=fc077ed9c10b7e2d</link>
  <description>
  &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://apnews.myway.com/article/20100319/D9EHLRE00.html&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; It&#39;s a civil suit to get justice. Dykes admitted to abusing 17 boys. &lt;br&gt; Ore. lawsuit claims Boy Scouts sex abuse coverup &lt;br&gt; Dykes was convicted three times between 1983 and 1994 of sexually &lt;br&gt; abusing boys, most of them Scouts.... &lt;br&gt; The Mormon bishop who also served as head of the Scout troop, Gordon
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.nf/group/misc.legal/browse_thread/thread/13112538c7257b84/fc077ed9c10b7e2d?show_docid=fc077ed9c10b7e2d</guid>
  <author>
  ritualabuseli...@aol.com
  (crime reporter)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 01:31:12 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>CT CPS Caseworker SUZANNE M [ Wrobel ] LISTRO Allegedly killed 7 month old foster child JURY TRIAL rescheduled 27th time!</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.nf/group/misc.legal/browse_thread/thread/b3d0df1d5fdabc08/f75e0b4fc1c35523?show_docid=f75e0b4fc1c35523</link>
  <description>
  &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.jud2.ct.gov/crdockets/parm1.aspx?source=Pending&amp;Key=5ced74d6-342e-40bd-93b1-3f73d0fadb0f&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; March 22 is 27th time listed on docket.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.nf/group/misc.legal/browse_thread/thread/b3d0df1d5fdabc08/f75e0b4fc1c35523?show_docid=f75e0b4fc1c35523</guid>
  <author>
  greego...@gmail.com
  (Greegor)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 23:10:57 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: LAPD Gang Officers Gun Down Unarmed Autustic Man</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.nf/group/misc.legal/browse_thread/thread/2bd60c901418d789/2d5413048ea0a044?show_docid=2d5413048ea0a044</link>
  <description>
  On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 09:43:34 -0700, richard &amp;lt;mem...@newsguy.com&amp;gt; &lt;br&gt; wrote: &lt;br&gt; I&#39;m so glad we have you &#39;expert&#39; opinion. &lt;br&gt; When did you get your POST certification, again?
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.nf/group/misc.legal/browse_thread/thread/2bd60c901418d789/2d5413048ea0a044?show_docid=2d5413048ea0a044</guid>
  <author>
  e...@theobvious.espphotography.com
  (Evan Platt)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 20:59:48 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Roy Whiting&#39;s latest crime</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.nf/group/misc.legal/browse_thread/thread/0992e75c7e5eef81/bdf7b68b4a9b2604?show_docid=bdf7b68b4a9b2604</link>
  <description>
  The thing about conspiracies, is that many are real. &lt;br&gt; WM
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.nf/group/misc.legal/browse_thread/thread/0992e75c7e5eef81/bdf7b68b4a9b2604?show_docid=bdf7b68b4a9b2604</guid>
  <author>
  wmcriticalestop...@googlemail.com
  (Nigel Oldfield)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 19:26:52 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
